The correct graphical design of this website is only visible in an Internet
browser program that properly supports
web standards, the text and pictures are viewable in any browser or Internet
device, but margins, widths and positions may be odd. Colour and font styling are turned
off completely for old or unrecognised browser programs to avoid crashing them.
Press REFRESH or RELOAD button to double-check your browser.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
| ||||||||
| Camden Black & Minority Ethnic Alliance |
| ABOUT CBMEA | MEMBERSHIP | POLICY | PUBLICATIONS | CBMEA NEWS | MEMBERS' NEWS | RESOURCES | MARKET | ARCHIVES | |
| Members' News | by: Lincoln Lim |
|---|
|
Neighbourhood MazeCBMEA Member Lincoln Lim offers a reality check on the neighbourhoods agenda So here we are. The neighbourhoods agenda is well and truly upon us. Government has spoken and Camden has responded, setting up neighbourhood partnerships and supporting these partnerships with (not insignificant) funding. Is this the way of things to come? If so, what does this mean in terms of service delivery? Is each partnership going to be devolved its own neighbourhood budget? If so, what does this mean for small community groups who operate on a pan-borough basis (in a wide-range of neighbourhoods)? Will we be required to make multiple applications for funding or just one? Perhaps most puzzling of all, how does all this link into the local area agreement agenda? So many questions but so few clear answers. And that’s the problem. The neighbourhoods agenda has developed with little clarity as to how a broad range of potentially tricky issues are to be resolved. Lacking too is a systematic step-by-step approach explaining, what is happening now, what will happen in the future and what the implications will be. This is not to say that the notion of empowering communities and neighbourhoods to have a greater say in setting the priorities, budgets and determining who provides services in their areas is anything but a good idea. Rather the issue is making sure that both objectives and intentions are communicated more clearly. For example, what role does the Council propose to play in the new set up - an arbiter, regulator, benevolent auntie/uncle? Clarity on issues such as this enables voluntary and community organisations to begin to engage the debate in a more meaningful way. As a service provider to a pan-borough minority ethnic community, I am concerned that, unless there is greater transparency, my organisation’s ability to provide seamless services could actually be undermined by the neighbourhood agenda. The effect of course being that neighbourhoods will make it harder, not easier and create exclusion and confusion, when it should increase opportunity and clarity. These may appear to be relatively minor points of detail to both Whitehall and the Town Hall, yet they have major implications for local communities and the various voluntary and community groups serving them. It’s time to unravel the neighbourhood maze. Revised on 29 Jan 2007 |
| ABOUT CBMEA | MEMBERSHIP | POLICY | PUBLICATIONS | CBMEA NEWS | MEMBERS' NEWS | RESOURCES | MARKET | ARCHIVES |
Implemented by Data Highways Ltd
959